翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Du Plessis ・ R v Duarte ・ R v Dudley and Stephens ・ R v Dyment ・ R v Dytham ・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co ・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd ・ R v Evans ・ R v Ewanchuk ・ R v Faulkner ・ R v Fearon ・ R v Feeney ・ R v Finta ・ R v Forlee ・ R v G ・ R v George ・ R v Ghosh ・ R v Glad Day Bookshops Inc ・ R v Gladstone ・ R v Gladue ・ R v Gnango ・ R v Godoy ・ R v Goltz ・ R v Gonzales ・ R v Grant ・ R v Grantham ・ R v Grillo ・ R v Gruenke ・ R v Guerin ・ R v Généreux Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v George ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v George ''R v George'', 1960 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada on different degrees of ''mens rea''. The accused was acquitted for a specific intent offence of robbery as he was too intoxicated at the time. However, he was convicted of the general intent offence of assault. Justice Fauteux famously described the distinction between general and specific intent offences: :''In considering the question of mens rea, a distinction is to be made between (i) intention as applied to acts considered in relation to their purposes and (ii) intention as applied to acts considered apart from their purposes. A general intent attending the commission of an act is, in some cases, the only intent required to constitute the crime while, in others, there must be, in addition to that general intent, a specific intent attending the purpose for the commission of the act.''〔p. 877〕 ==Notes== 〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v George」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.